🔥 Hidream I1 is online! 🔥

We just added Hidream I1 to our T2I leaderboard (https://www.rapidata.ai/leaderboard/image-models) benchmarked using 195k+ human responses from 38k+ annotators, all collected in under 24 hours.

It landed #3 overall, right behind:
- @openai 4o
- @black-forest-labs Flux 1 Pro
...and just ahead of @black-forest-labs Flux 1.1 Pro, @xai-org Aurora and @google Imagen3.

Want to dig into the data? Check out our dataset here:
Rapidata/Hidream_t2i_human_preference

What model should we benchmark next?

liked a dataset 11 months ago

Rapidata/Hidream_t2i_human_preference

Viewer • Updated May 13, 2025 • 13k • 175 • 22

liked a dataset 12 months ago

Rapidata/2k-ranked-images-open-image-preferences-v1

Viewer • Updated Apr 10, 2025 • 2k • 44 • 27

reactedto jasoncorkill's post with 🔥 about 1 year ago

Post

3104

🔥 Yesterday was a fire day!
We dropped two brand-new datasets capturing Human Preferences for text-to-video and text-to-image generations powered by our own crowdsourcing tool!

Whether you're working on model evaluation, alignment, or fine-tuning, this is for you.

1. Text-to-Video Dataset (Pika 2.2 model):
Rapidata/text-2-video-human-preferences-pika2.2

2. Text-to-Image Dataset (Reve-AI Halfmoon):
Rapidata/Reve-AI-Halfmoon_t2i_human_preference

Let’s train AI on AI-generated content with humans in the loop.
Let’s make generative models that actually get us.

reactedto jasoncorkill's post with 🚀👍 about 1 year ago

Post

2101

🚀 First Benchmark of @OpenAI 's 4o Image Generation Model!

We've just completed the first-ever (to our knowledge) benchmarking of the new OpenAI 4o image generation model, and the results are impressive!

In our tests, OpenAI 4o image generation absolutely crushed leading competitors, including @black-forest-labs , @google , @xai-org , Ideogram, Recraft, and @deepseek-ai , in prompt alignment and coherence! They hold a gap of more than 20% to the nearest competitor in terms of Bradley-Terry score, the biggest we have seen since the beginning of the benchmark!

The benchmarks are based on 200k human responses collected through our API. However, the most challenging part wasn't the benchmarking itself, but generating and downloading the images:

- 5 hours to generate 1000 images (no API available yet)
- Just 10 minutes to set up and launch the benchmark
- Over 200,000 responses rapidly collected

While generating the images, we faced some hurdles that meant that we had to leave out certain parts of our prompt set. Particularly we observed that the OpenAI 4o model proactively refused to generate certain images:

🚫 Styles of living artists: completely blocked
🚫 Copyrighted characters (e.g., Darth Vader, Pokémon): initially generated but subsequently blocked

Overall, OpenAI 4o stands out significantly in alignment and coherence, especially excelling in certain unusual prompts that have historically caused issues such as: 'A chair on a cat.' See the images for more examples!